Is there a process for resolving issues with the quality and thoroughness of results?
Is there a process for resolving issues with the quality and thoroughness of results? I have one issue: There are enough articles to find a report with all the usual data in order to be able to review. The main problem with this report was that it focused on the reviews published by different authors (e.g. B.S., F.F., O.S.), and where some of the numbers are based only on the reviews published by your own previous system (e.g. Ph.D.). And I am not sure that they are all the same topic, but for ease of comparison it may be difficult to judge if maybe they are all the same topic. I simply wish we had a complete picture and documentation that clearly details all of the author information and how…